Getting to Yes Explained: The Secret to Conflict-Free Negotiation
Negotiation isn’t just for business deals - It’s a skill we use every day, from asking for a raise to deciding where to eat with friends.
The ability to communicate clearly, find common ground, and confidently ask for what you want can make a huge difference in your success and happiness. When you know how to negotiate well, you don’t just settle: you create better opportunities.
 |
|---|
| Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash |
In this article, I dig into the core insights from Getting to Yes - a book developed within the Harvard Negotiation Project by professors Roger Fisher & William Ury.
If you are interested in improving your negotiation skills, grab a cup of coffee, and let’s get started.
Quick Summary for those in a hurry
The fundamental concept of Getting to Yes is the concept of principled negotiation with the following core elements:
- Separate people from the problem: Negotiations involve emotions and relationships. Focus on solving the issue, not attacking the person.
- Focus on interests, not positions: Instead of arguing over fixed demands, identify the underlying needs and concerns of both sides.
- Invent options for mutual gain: Think creatively and explore win-win solutions.
- Use objective criteria: Rely on fair standards (e.g., market value, expert opinions) rather than personal pressure to decide what’s reasonable.
- Know your best alternative to a negotiated agreement: Understand your best backup plan if the negotiation doesn’t work out, so you don’t settle for a bad deal.
Principled Negotiation
The central thesis of Getting to Yes is the concept of principled negotiation, which the authors contrast with two other common negotiation styles:
- Soft negotiation: Prioritizes maintaining relationships over substantive outcomes.
- Hard negotiation: Prioritizes winning over relationships.
In contrast to these negotiation styles, principle negotiation strives to conserve fairness while still being firm on the interest side.
1. Separate the people from the problem
One of the most common challenges in negotiation is that emotions, egos, and personal relationships can interfere with the process.
Roger Fisher and William Ury emphasize that negotiators should treat each other as problem-solvers rather than adversaries. This means understanding the other party’s perspective and not just challenging the other’s demands.
They highlight the following techniques for effective communication and emotion management:
- Active listening
- Acknowledging emotions
- Establishing trust
2. Focus on interests, not positions
Negotiators often become fixated on their stated positions (what they want) rather than the underlying interests (the reasons why they want it).
By shifting the focus to interests (the reasons why they want it), both parties can uncover creative solutions that satisfy both sides.
Open-ended questions are a great tool to explore each other’s interests, revealing shared goals and reducing conflict.
3. Invent options for mutual gain
Traditional negotiations often revolve around a win-lose mentality, where one party’s gain comes at the expense of the other.
Within principled negotiation, negotiators should engage in brainstorming and creative thinking to generate multiple options before deciding on a final agreement. This step requires avoiding premature judgment and considering options that benefit both sides.
Essentially it is about expanding the pie by adding new elements instead of sharing the pie that already exists.
4. Insist on using objective criteria
Rather than basing agreements on subjective opinions or power dynamics, Getting to Yes advocates for the use of independent (and objectively measurable) standards.
These can include market values, legal precedents, scientific judgments, or professional standards.
Using objective criteria makes it easier to convince the other party that a solution is fair and helps prevent a deadlock.
5. Know your BATNA
One of the most powerful concepts introduced in the book is BATNA, which stands for the Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement.
Knowing one’s BATNA provides leverage and helps negotiators avoid agreeing to unfavorable deals simply out of desperation. The stronger the BATNA, the better the negotiation position.
Why is BATNA Important?
- It gives you leverage: When you have a strong alternative, you negotiate from a position of strength rather than desperation.
- It prevents accepting bad deals: Knowing your best alternative ensures you don’t agree to terms worse than what you could get elsewhere.
- It helps set a walk-away point: If the proposed deal is worse than your BATNA, you can confidently walk away.
Example of BATNA in Action
Imagine you’re negotiating a job offer, but the salary is too low. If you have another job offer with better pay, that’s your BATNA. If the employer doesn’t match or improve the offer, you can confidently walk away and take the better opportunity.
Additional Strategies and Techniques
Dealing with difficult negotiators
Not all negotiations occur under ideal circumstances, and some counterparts may use hardball tactics such as deception, threats, or extreme demands. Getting to Yes provides strategies for handling these situations effectively:
- Avoiding reaction traps: Instead of responding emotionally, negotiators should reframe the situation and focus on interests.
- Using negotiation jujitsu: Redirecting the opponent’s aggression by asking questions and using neutral, non-defensive language.
- Employing a third-party mediator: Bringing in a neutral mediator can help facilitate discussions and break deadlocks.
The One-Text Procedure
When negotiations become gridlocked, Roger Fisher and William Ury suggest using a single draft text to encourage collaboration.
One party prepares a proposal and asks for the other’s suggestions to refine it rather than engaging in a back-and-forth exchange of separate positions. This approach fosters cooperation and often leads to more satisfactory outcomes.
Final thoughts
Getting to Yes revolutionized the field of negotiation by offering a structured, principled approach that moves beyond positional bargaining.
For a long time, it has been the must-read book #1 in the field of negotiation. Although the book already surpassed its 40th anniversary, it is still relevant. However, critics argue that the approaches assume rational behavior and overlook cases where one party is irrational or dishonest, which, frankly speaking, can happen a lot in real life. Others suggest that in power-imbalanced negotiations, the weaker party may struggle to apply these principles effectively.
Despite these criticisms, the book remains a cornerstone in negotiation theory and practice.
Thank you for reading my article on Getting to Yes. Next week I’ll publish my thoughts on another popular but quite different negotiation book: Never Split the Difference. If you are interested, stay tuned!
Disclaimer: For this article, I used generative AI support. As a basis, I used my notes back from when I initially read the book. I used AI specifically for creating a first draft of an article based on these notes and then edited it manually.